« Dishtowel | Main | Mission Accomplished! »
December 15, 2005
Organic Versus Oreos
Melissa over at Suburban Bliss posted about parents overly concerned with food their children might be exposed to in school. She states (first quoted in Parents magazine) "I'm always amazed when I hear parents obsessing over what kids had for a snack. I worry about bigger issues, like what he's learning - not whether he ate a [stupid fucking] cookie." And (in her post today) “If you're eating healthy at home, will it really matter all that much if your child has a banana muffin with GASP chocolate chips while he's at school?”
For the most part I agree. There are definitely things more important than what types of snacks parents bring to school. But on the other hand, I have some concerns.
In our local school district, they misinterpreted a law and ended up stating that parents could not bring homemade treats to school. (The actual law involves food that will be sold. That in itself I find issue with given that a bake sale is more fun with homemade goods than with stuff you can just buy at the corner market!) The official school snack policy states that food must be prepackaged. By definition, this means the higher fat, high preservative stuff.
One of my friends wanted to bring fruit and other healthy things to her son’s classroom, but since it wasn’t a prepackaged HandiSnack, she wasn’t allowed to do it. In this case, the children automatically end up eating crap every day. Their at-home eating habits may be different. However, I don’t like that the element of choice is taken away. The kids are given a snack every day by a parent. And this parent must only bring individually pre-packaged food.
Since the Cat follows the Feingold Diet, I have concerns about the policy of parents bringing the daily snack. I cannot “monitor” what other parents bring (and wouldn’t want to!), and the prepackaged snacks that are deemed acceptable for school policy are not allowed on the Feingold Diet because of the preservatives.
In response to Melissa’s post, Taamar wrote the following:
My son goes to school with a kid who is using the Feingold diet to control his ADHD. When it was my turn to go in with a snack and a book to read I made cookies, and the kids mother piously said "None for Michael, he can't eat normal foods". I about flipped at her for her attitude, but I smiled and said (within her childs hearing), "Everything in these cookies is Feingold safe, I'll be happy to give you the list of ingredients and brands I used if you'd like."The bitch looked disappointed! I'd taken away the 'specialness' of her child and provided him with a treat that didn't come directly from her, and she was upset about it! Meanwhile, the little boy was thrilled to be able to have the same treat as his friends. Poor kid will have years of therapy over this.
What she explains is exactly what I don’t want to be perceived as being. When the rest of the kids have a treat, I don’t like having to whisper to the Cat, “Sorry, I’ll get you something later. Don’t eat this. It will make you feel funny.” I do not expect other parents to be concerned with using all Feingold safe ingredients when they make treats. I don’t want to isolate my child by making a big deal about it, but I also don’t want to have him eat something that will cause us great difficulty later. I try to be subtle, but there is no winning scenario.
Usually, I am not the one telling the Cat he can’t eat the treat. The teachers have a box of Feingold-safe cookies and candies that they give him if an “unexpected” treat pops up. Ideally, I know in advance that a particular day is so-and-so’s birthday, so I’ll bring a treat for the Cat. Sometimes, I can make something that closely approximates what the other children will be receiving. But calling the parent ahead of time to find out what will be served is an awkward thing to do since I don’t want to be preachy in any way. Last year, I sent out an email to the class asking for advanced notice if people were bringing something in. That made me uncomfortable, so this year I didn’t bother.
Sometimes, well meaning parents will ask “Oh, what is he allergic to? That way I can make something he can eat!” Taamar’s parent in question is lucky that she seems to know the ingredients and brands allowed on the Feingold Diet, but the majority of people out there do not. I am uncomfortable rattling off all the things not allowed, and I would never give people a list of specific brands. Instead, I respond, “Oh, thank you for asking. Unfortunately, the list is rather extensive, so I will be happy to bring a treat for him. Do you know whether the cupcakes will be chocolate or vanilla? (etc.)”
I know this can be perceived as being self-righteous. I am not trusting that another parent can provide a “safe” treat for the Cat. I am possibly insulting the parent if he or she intends to make homemade treats: “No preservatives! No artificial flavors!” they may proclaim. But what about the artificial colored icing on top (homemade icing perhaps, but colored with food coloring)? Or that the cupcake happens to have chocolate that was preserved prior to being bought (cut up Hershey’s, for example)? My mom went into a bakery to ask them about their ingredients. They were insulted because they kept asserting that their product was made from scratch. But my mom wanted to make sure they weren’t using something like almond extract or orange zest that would have wreaked havoc for the Cat.
By refusing treats made by another parent, I am not expecting that they were not homemade or that their treats are somehow “less” than those that I bring for the Cat. Rather, I simply don’t know what ingredients went into them.
Birthday parties are uncomfortable. I hate bringing the Cat a “special lunch” and a separate piece of cake or cupcake. I do not mean to offend the hosts in any way, but what choice do I have?
I don’t revel in my child’s “specialness,” nor do I think it is fantastic that everything he eats has been prepared by me, my husband, or another family member with the Feingold list. I would love for the Cat to be able to blend into his classmates, eat what they are eating, and for me not to spend time and energy the night before making treats from scratch. Just yesterday, I brought the holiday cookies for the whole class so that the Cat could eat what the other kids were eating (with the exception of the store bought ones I picked up after I ran out of steam making homemade!)
I realize Taamar’s comment was considering a particular “bitch” who very well may be haughty about her child’s situation. My thoughts here are not meant to be a direct defense to her comment as a general statement of parents whose children have allergies. Rather, her comment brought up worries that I have as I don’t want to be perceived that way. I don’t want other parents to see the Cat as being different. I don’t want to be different than the other parents. But we are different. Not better. Different.
In the parent-brought snack scenario I described earlier, the Cat would be isolated from his classmates on all days except those in which I brought snacks (and even so, I can’t think of many prepackaged foods he can eat off the top of my head, so I might have to bring the rest of the kids something different anyway.)
To be clear, the Cat is not yet in our local school district. He begins Kindergarten next year. As I have posted before, we are considering a private school, so it may be that I won’t be dealing with the school district. Or, it may be that their snack policy will be revised by the time the Cat attends (if he does.) On the other hand, the private school we are considering has a strong focus on healthy eating, and as such feeds the kids breakfast, snack, and lunch. Although they have an organic garden and are concerned with “treat portions” versus “nourishment portions,” the great majority of foods that the Cat has difficulty with are not unhealthy per se; they contain salicylates. So a blueberry, for example, is plenty “healthy,” but just not for the Cat. The upshot is that I will have to pack a separate lunch for the Cat regardless of whether he is in private or public school.
When I attended elementary school, parent supplied treats were reserved for birthdays. The parents and/or the school weren’t responsible for feeding the children on a daily basis. It seems going back to the “you pack your own lunch” policy would eliminate a bunch of hassles since those people worried about sugar, preservatives, or allergies can be in control of what their children are eating. Of course, that doesn’t eliminate the “I’ll trade you my organic tofu sandwich for your Lunchable” conversations, but I think more parents could breathe a bit easier knowing that they are at least responsible for what is in the lunchbox as it exits the house each morning.
Posted by karianna at December 15, 2005 02:18 PM
Comments
Kari, I can understand your concerns - both for the Cat's welfare and for your own comfort among the other parents. I think any reasonable parent would be willing to acquiesce to your preferences (e.g., bringing your own homemade treats for the Cat), without thinking that you are being difficult or holding yourself or the Cat above the others. After all, if they were in your position, I would expect that they would share the same concerns.
One of the boys at Tacy's school was recently diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes. Another child shared some M-n-Ms with him one afternoon, and the teachers were extremely concerned. Of course they took all the appropriate measures, but they also questioned how they could have prevented it. Should they take away all the M-n-Ms, since this boy might inadvertently eat some and become ill? And what about kids who have peanut allergies - apparently the coating of M-n-Ms contain peanut oil, enough to trigger a reaction in kids who are extremely allergic. It's a tough situation, and frankly I think it's one that the teachers and the other parents should be willing to incorporate into their plans.
And I do agree with you re the pre-packaged foods. At Tacy's school, they cook and serve all foods on the premises, so I don't bring anything in. But at her old school, I brought her lunch every day. Year round, I took the time to prepare fresh fruits and veggies, as well as healthy entrees, and I have to admit that I was dismayed to see what other parents brought. Nothing but pre-packaged junk. And when I say junk, I mean brownies, jello, pudding, cheetos - not even cheese and crackers.
Posted by: Julie at December 15, 2005 07:14 PM
The peanut allergy thing has had its own set of controversies. Our school district doesn't have a policy, but a neighboring one made the entire Kindergarten and accompanying playground peanut-free. Many parents were outraged, but the boy whose parents had forced the peanut ban was extraordinarily allergic. I don't know what they did once he went to the 1-3 grade lot (whether it then became peanut-free).
When I worked at a cooperative daycare when the Cat was two, they also had a peanut ban. Whenever a lunch had peanuts in it, I had to seal it up along with a note stating the ban. One parent started screaming at me because she said, "I thought none of the kids scheduled today were allergic!" She was worried that her son was "starving" because he couldn't eat his PB & J sandwich. I had to explain that the ban was in effect at all times because one day a kid with PB on his hands could touch a toy that the next day a peanut-allergic kid might pick up. She was not understanding, and called my supervisor to complain about me.
I understand both sides. Lots of parents say their kids will ONLY eat PB&J and feel it is unfair for a school to dictate what their child can eat. (The Cat has never eaten a sandwich other than PB!) But then if it were my son with a fatal allergy, I'd be terrified that some peanut oil might make its way onto his hands.
I think the ban type solution lets up in higher grades, both because the allergic child knows to be careful and because the allergies frequently lessen with age.
Posted by: Kari at December 16, 2005 03:22 PM
Great post. I could go on and on, but i won't. I'm amazed about the packaged foods policy.
My daughter is anaphylactic to peanuts and tree nuts. All social situations are very difficult for us. I tried preschool and found the level of cooperation was not enough to make me feel safe. A large part of our decision to do private school was because of her allergies. I get so frustrated when people don't take life-threatening allergies as such or feel put out by them. A kindergarten class with kids eating peanut butter sandwiches is like a class full of kids with guns. An allergy that is anaphylactic is by definition life-threatening - there really is no degree of seriousness.
Anyway, i'm sorry to rant in your space. I feel for your situation. I used to leave a bag of cupcakes in the freezer at the preschool for unexpected birthday days.
Posted by: jess at December 17, 2005 10:39 PM
my big question with all this snack talk, is what is with all the snacks? i remember eating breakfast going to school, then either eating my lunch at school (from home) or going home for lunch when i could. was there a big study between the 70s and now that said kids must eat every hour? i mean, i am diabetic and i have to eat every few hours, but this seems excessive. the ban on home made snacks is stupid too.
i work at my gym's daycare 6 hours a week and we are not peanut free, but we do have kids that come with epipens (2 of them, both allergic to peanuts). it is really only our kids who eat, so i generally don't bring anything peanutty. i understand the danger, but i also understand finicky kids who will eat nothing one week but PB&J and trying to "persuade" a toddler to eat a certain food is difficult.
food has become so incredibly complicated for so many of us. i feel like an amateur dietitian since becoming diabetic. i can give you the grams of carbs in something from 20 paces.
didn't the Jetsons eat food in pill form? that seems so easy......
Posted by: jenB at December 18, 2005 12:41 AM
my big question with all this snack talk, is what is with all the snacks? i remember eating breakfast going to school, then either eating my lunch at school (from home) or going home for lunch when i could. was there a big study between the 70s and now that said kids must eat every hour? i mean, i am diabetic and i have to eat every few hours, but this seems excessive. the ban on home made snacks is stupid too.
i work at my gym's daycare 6 hours a week and we are not peanut free, but we do have kids that come with epipens (2 of them, both allergic to peanuts). it is really only our kids who eat, so i generally don't bring anything peanutty. i understand the danger, but i also understand finicky kids who will eat nothing one week but PB&J and trying to "persuade" a toddler to eat a certain food is difficult.
food has become so incredibly complicated for so many of us. i feel like an amateur dietitian since becoming diabetic. i can give you the grams of carbs in something from 20 paces.
didn't the Jetsons eat food in pill form? that seems so easy......
Posted by: jenB at December 18, 2005 12:41 AM
my big question with all this snack talk, is what is with all the snacks? i remember eating breakfast going to school, then either eating my lunch at school (from home) or going home for lunch when i could. was there a big study between the 70s and now that said kids must eat every hour? i mean, i am diabetic and i have to eat every few hours, but this seems excessive. the ban on home made snacks is stupid too.
i work at my gym's daycare 6 hours a week and we are not peanut free, but we do have kids that come with epipens (2 of them, both allergic to peanuts). it is really only our kids who eat, so i generally don't bring anything peanutty. i understand the danger, but i also understand finicky kids who will eat nothing one week but PB&J and trying to "persuade" a toddler to eat a certain food is difficult.
food has become so incredibly complicated for so many of us. i feel like an amateur dietitian since becoming diabetic. i can give you the grams of carbs in something from 20 paces.
didn't the Jetsons eat food in pill form? that seems so easy......
Posted by: jenB at December 18, 2005 12:41 AM
Jess, thank you for your perspective. I am thankful that the Cat's allergies are not anaphylactic, and are actually "food sensitivities" not technically "food allergies."
I would definitely be frightened if he had a fatal allergy because I know the teachers at the Cat's school are NOT super vigilant about keeping him away from the trouble foods. (The playground teacher has essentially told me she doesn't believe in food sensitivities.) Of course, if it were a fatal allergy, perhaps they would be, but I wouldn't want to take that chance!
JenB: I agree that food has become so complex that it would be easier to eat in pill form. But oh, do I love the taste of food! :)
From preferences to life-threatening choices, the food we select and consume is so complex for hosts of events, guests of events, parents, teachers, and the kids themselves.
At our office party last night, we had three different people request special meals for various reasons (vegetarian, vegan, "piscatarian")!
Posted by: Kari at December 18, 2005 08:27 AM
ack, sorry for the LONG and then double post. i should have been in bed. :-)
Posted by: jenB at December 18, 2005 11:39 PM